Leucippus of Miletus: The Architect of Atomism and the Quest for the Ultimate Nature of Reality

Introduction: The Shadowy Figure and the Revolutionary Idea

In the annals of Western thought, few figures present a paradox as profound as that of Leucippus. He stands as a ghost at the genesis of one of history’s most influential ideas. While his very existence was a matter of debate even in antiquity, the intellectual system he is credited with founding—atomism—has proven to be a cornerstone of philosophy and science for over two and a half millennia.¹ He is a founder whose own foundations are obscured by the mists of time, a man whose legacy vastly outweighs his biography. The name Leucippus, therefore, does not refer to a substance to be prepared or a product to be utilized, but to a person and the revolutionary system of thought he conceived. The "preparation" of Leucippus was the intellectual labor of formulating his theory; its "utilization" has been the continuous process of adoption, critique, modification, and application by countless philosophers and scientists who followed.⁵

This report argues that Leucippus, despite the scarcity of biographical data, was a historical figure of seminal importance. His theory of atoms and the void was not a random speculation but a direct and ingenious solution to the most pressing philosophical crisis of his era. In resolving this crisis, he set in motion a chain of intellectual developments that rejected divine or purposeful explanations for the cosmos, championed a mechanistic and deterministic worldview, and ultimately culminated in our modern, scientific understanding of the physical world. To comprehend Leucippus is to trace the journey of an idea from a brilliant philosophical gambit to the bedrock of empirical science. This exploration will proceed by first establishing the historical reality of the man himself, then delving into the specifics of his atomic doctrine as a response to his predecessors. It will then examine his relationship with his famous student, Democritus, before tracing the long and complex legacy of his ideas from the ancient world to the present day.

Part I: The Man and the Myth: In Search of the Historical Leucippus

Before dissecting the philosophy, it is essential to address the philosopher. The "who" and "where" of Leucippus are shrouded in uncertainty, a puzzle pieced together from the fragmentary accounts of later writers. Yet, a careful examination of this evidence allows for the construction of a plausible, if sparse, historical profile.

The Doxographical Puzzle: Did Leucippus Exist?

The most startling question surrounding Leucippus is whether he was a man or a myth, a controversy that began in the ancient world itself.¹ The primary source for this doubt comes from a report by the 3rd-century CE biographer Diogenes Laertius, who notes that the philosopher Epicurus (c. 341–270 BCE) denied that a philosopher named Leucippus had ever existed.¹ As Epicurus was himself a prominent atomist, his denial carries significant weight and for centuries fueled scholarly debate.

However, the evidence affirming Leucippus's existence is far stronger and comes from sources both chronologically closer and more historically reliable. Aristotle (384–322 BCE) and his student and successor Theophrastus (c. 371–c. 287 BCE) explicitly and repeatedly credit Leucippus with being the founder of the atomist school.¹ Aristotle, a meticulous historian of philosophy and a staunch critic of atomism, had no motive to invent a founder for a rival theory; his testimony is thus considered exceptionally strong.¹¹ Theophrastus, who continued Aristotle's project of documenting earlier philosophies, likewise attributed the foundational work

The Great World-System to Leucippus.⁹

The apparent contradiction between these accounts can be understood not merely as a matter of lost records, but as a reflection of the intellectual politics of ancient Greece. Epicurus founded his own atomist school, the Garden, more than a century after Leucippus's time. By then, Leucippus's fame had been completely eclipsed by that of his brilliant student, Democritus.⁹ Epicurus significantly modified Democritean atomism to address philosophical criticisms and to make room for concepts like free will.¹⁵ In the highly competitive intellectual landscape of Athens, it would have been a powerful strategic move for Epicurus to deny the existence of the obscure originator (Leucippus) and position himself as the direct successor and corrector of the famous systematizer (Democritus), thereby bolstering his own school's claim to originality and authority.⁷ Aristotle and Theophrastus, by contrast, were engaged in a more dispassionate, encyclopedic project of documenting and critiquing all prior philosophies.⁹ Their attribution lacks the self-serving motive that may have colored Epicurus's denial. Consequently, the overwhelming consensus among modern scholars is that Leucippus was a real historical figure, and the ancient controversy over his existence is now seen as a fascinating chapter in the history of how philosophical legacies are constructed, contested, and transmitted.²

Biographical Fragments: Who, Where, and When?

While we can be confident Leucippus lived, the details of his life remain fragmentary. Ancient sources place him squarely in the 5th century BCE, with probable dates of activity around 480 to 420 BCE.⁸ This makes him a contemporary of other "pluralist" philosophers like Anaxagoras and Empedocles, who were all grappling with the same fundamental philosophical problems.⁸

His birthplace is variously reported as Miletus, Elea, or Abdera.¹ Each location suggests a different intellectual heritage. Miletus would connect him to the Ionian tradition of natural philosophy, which sought to explain the world through material principles.¹⁹ Elea, in southern Italy, would place him in direct geographical contact with the Eleatic school of Parmenides and Zeno, the very philosophers whose ideas he sought to overcome.¹⁰ Abdera, in Thrace, was the hometown of his student Democritus, suggesting he may have founded his school there.⁹

Diogenes Laertius reports that Leucippus was a "student" of Zeno of Elea.¹ This is likely not meant in the formal sense of a pupil attending lectures, but in the intellectual sense of being a successor who was deeply engaged with and responding to Zeno's famous paradoxes of motion.⁹ These paradoxes, which argued that motion was logically impossible because any distance could be divided infinitely, posed a direct challenge that Leucippus's atomic theory was designed to solve.¹

The ultimate source of the ambiguity surrounding Leucippus is the loss of his writings. He is credited with authoring two books, Megas Diakosmos (The Great World-System) and Peri Nou (On Mind).¹ These works have not survived, and our knowledge of their contents comes entirely from quotations and summaries in the works of later authors, most notably Aristotle, Theophrastus, and Diogenes Laertius.²

Part II: The Atomic Doctrine: A Response to the Eleatics

The "what" and "why" of Leucippus's philosophy cannot be understood in a vacuum. His theory was a targeted and brilliant response to a specific intellectual crisis that had brought Greek natural philosophy to a standstill.

The Philosophical Crisis: Parmenides, Zeno, and the Denial of Change

In the early 5th century BCE, the philosopher Parmenides of Elea put forth a powerful and deeply counter-intuitive argument. Through rigorous logic, he concluded that reality, or "what is" (Being), must be a single, eternal, and unchanging entity. A key premise of his argument was that "what is not" (non-being, or the void) cannot exist, because one cannot speak or think of what is not. If there is no void, then there can be no empty space to separate one thing from another, nor can there be any empty space for things to move into. From this, Parmenides concluded that all plurality (the existence of many things) and all motion must be illusions of the senses.²

His follower, Zeno of Elea, defended this radical conclusion with a series of famous paradoxes. The "Dichotomy" paradox, for example, argues that to travel any distance, one must first travel half the distance, and before that, half of that half, and so on ad infinitum. Because this requires completing an infinite number of tasks, motion can never begin.¹ The Eleatic school, through pure reason, had arrived at a conclusion that contradicted all human experience. This created a profound impasse for the Ionian tradition of natural philosophy, which had been dedicated to explaining the very phenomena of change and motion that the Eleatics now claimed were impossible.¹⁴

The Foundational Principles: Atoms and the Void

Leucippus's genius lay in identifying the precise linchpin of the Eleatic argument and dismantling it with a single, revolutionary conceptual move. He did not merely postulate atoms; he paired them with the void, declaring both to be equally real. This was the key that unlocked the Eleatic prison.

The entire Eleatic system rested on the premise that "what is not"—the void—is unreal and unthinkable.² Leucippus cleverly turned their logic on its head. He accepted their premise that without a void, motion is impossible.²³ However, instead of denying motion (which would mean denying the evidence of our senses), he reasoned in reverse: because motion plainly exists, the void must also exist.² He redefined "what is not" (

to mē on) not as an absolute nothingness, but as a different kind of reality: non-corporeal, empty space (kenon).¹⁰ His radical declaration, as reported by later writers, was that "what is not, is no more real than what is".⁸ This move brilliantly solved both of the Eleatics' major problems at once. The void provided the empty space necessary for atoms to

move, and it provided the separation necessary for a plurality of atoms to exist.

The Nature of Atoms (Atomos)

Having established a stage (the void), Leucippus populated it with his actors (the atoms). The Greek word atomos means "uncuttable" or "indivisible," and he endowed these fundamental particles with specific properties.¹⁴

• Indivisible and Solid: Atoms are the fundamental constituents of matter. They are absolutely solid and contain no void within them. It is this internal solidity that makes them indivisible; there is no empty space inside an atom into which a blade could pass to cut it.²
• Eternal and Unchanging: Leucippus cleverly took the properties that Parmenides had assigned to his monolithic "One Being" and applied them to each individual atom. Each atom is eternal, ungenerated, indestructible, and unalterable.¹¹ All the change we perceive in the world is not a change
  in the atoms themselves, but merely a change of their arrangement, combination, and position.
• Infinite in Number and Variety: To account for the endless variety of the observed world, Leucippus posited that atoms themselves must be infinite in number and come in an infinite variety of shapes and sizes.² He reasoned that there was "no more" reason for an atom to have one particular shape than any other, a primitive application of the principle of sufficient reason.²

The Nature of the Void (Kenon)

The void was just as crucial to his system as the atoms. It was the great enabler, the infinite empty space that was the precondition for all cosmic activity. Without the void, atoms would be locked in place, and the dynamic, changing universe could not exist.² This conceptualization of space as a real entity in its own right, distinct from the matter that occupies it, was a profound philosophical leap.¹⁰

A Mechanical Universe: Causality, Necessity, and Cosmology

Leucippus's universe was not just particulate; it was also deterministic and purely mechanical. This is captured in the single, profound sentence that has survived from his work On Mind: "Nothing happens at random (maten), but everything from reason (ek logou) and by necessity (hyp' anankēs)".²

This statement is a declaration of universal causality. Every event in the cosmos is the necessary result of a prior chain of atomic motions and collisions. There is no room for chance, divine intervention, or purpose (teleology) in this system.² This was a radical departure from the worldviews of his predecessors, such as Anaxagoras, who posited a cosmic

Nous (Mind) to direct events, or Empedocles, who invoked the quasi-mythical forces of Love and Strife.¹⁰ For Leucippus, the universe was a machine, not a creature guided by a soul.

Based on these principles, Leucippus developed a detailed cosmogony, or theory of the world's formation, which is preserved in the account of Diogenes Laertius.²⁰ The process begins with a large group of atoms falling into a great void, where they become entangled and form a vortex, or "whirl".¹² Within this spinning vortex, atoms are sorted by a mechanical process, not a mysterious force. Like grains being shaken in a sieve or pebbles being sorted by waves on a shore, the larger, heavier, and more irregularly shaped atoms tend to collect at the center, while the smaller, finer, and smoother atoms are pushed to the periphery.¹⁰ This central mass of atoms coalesces to form the Earth, which Leucippus described as being shaped like a drum or tambourine.¹⁰ A "membrane" or "shell" of atoms forms around this central mass, and as it rotates at great speed, it captures more atoms from the surrounding void. The friction and speed of this revolution cause some of these captured atomic clusters to ignite, forming the Sun, Moon, and stars.²⁰

Crucially, because both atoms and the void are infinite, this process of world-formation is not a unique event. Leucippus argued that there are innumerable worlds (cosmoi) constantly coming into being and perishing throughout the infinite void, all according to the same mechanical necessity.²

Part III: The Atomist School: Leucippus and Democritus

Leucippus did not work in isolation. His name is inextricably linked with that of his student, Democritus of Abdera (c. 460 – c. 370 BCE), who became the great champion and systematizer of atomism.

The Master and the Pupil: A Problem of Attribution

The standard historical view is clear: Leucippus was the founder who originated the core principles of the theory, and Democritus was his brilliant associate who elaborated, expanded, and applied these principles to every field of inquiry.⁹ However, distinguishing their specific contributions with certainty is nearly impossible. Most ancient sources, including Aristotle, often speak of them in the same breath ("Leucippus and Democritus say...") or attribute the entire developed system to the far more famous Democritus.¹ Democritus was a true polymath who reportedly wrote over 60 books on everything from physics and ethics to mathematics and music, whereas Leucippus's known output was small and is now lost.¹³ Inevitably, the student's vast and celebrated body of work absorbed and obscured the master's foundational contribution.

Scholarly Distinctions: Theorized Differences in Their Doctrines

Despite the conflation in ancient sources, scholars have attempted to tease apart their respective roles by analyzing subtle differences in later reports. While speculative, these distinctions paint a plausible picture of the development of atomist thought from its inception to its mature form.

Table 1: Leucippus vs. Democritus: A Comparison of Attributed Contributions

Democritus appears to have taken Leucippus's core physical theory and expanded it into a comprehensive philosophical system. Where Leucippus may have argued simply that atoms are very small, Democritus seems to have developed a more nuanced theory where the specific size and shape of atoms determined the properties of the things they composed. For example, he proposed that liquids like water are made of smooth, round atoms that can easily roll past one another, while solids like iron are made of rough, hooked atoms that lock together.³³

Furthermore, Democritus extended atomism far beyond physics. He developed a detailed theory of perception and knowledge, arguing that qualities like sweetness and bitterness are not properties of the atoms themselves but exist "by convention," as subjective experiences created in the perceiver by the interaction of atoms from the object with the atoms of the soul.³³ He also founded an ethical system based on atomism, advocating for

euthymia, or "cheerfulness," a state of tranquility achieved through moderation and an understanding of the mechanical nature of the universe.¹⁷ Leucippus appears to have been the architect who drew the blueprint for the atomist universe; Democritus was the master builder who constructed the entire edifice, complete with its ethical and epistemological dimensions.

Part IV: The Long Shadow of the Atom: Influence and Legacy

The idea born in the mind of Leucippus embarked on a remarkable journey through Western history, being adopted, suppressed, transformed, and ultimately vindicated. Its influence stretches from the philosophical schools of Athens to the particle accelerators of the 21st century.

Atomism in the Ancient World: Adoption and Opposition

The most significant early adopter of atomism was Epicurus, who founded his school in Athens around 306 BCE.³⁸ He made atomism the physical foundation for his ethical philosophy, which aimed to liberate humanity from fear—particularly the fear of death and divine retribution.¹⁵ To do this, he needed a universe that ran on its own, without meddling gods. Leucippus's mechanical cosmos was the perfect fit. However, Epicurus made two crucial modifications to the original theory.¹⁵ First, he added

weight as an intrinsic property of atoms, giving them a natural tendency to move "downward" in the void. This addressed Aristotle's criticism that the original atomists had not explained the source of motion.¹⁵ Second, and more famously, he introduced the

"swerve" (clinamen): an uncaused, unpredictable, minuscule deviation in an atom's path. This swerve served two vital purposes: it allowed atoms, which would otherwise fall in parallel lines, to collide and form complex bodies, and it broke the rigid chain of causal necessity established by Leucippus, thereby making room for human free will.¹⁵ The most complete account of this Epicurean atomism was preserved for posterity by the Roman poet Lucretius (c. 99–55 BCE) in his magnificent didactic poem,

De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things), which became the primary vehicle for transmitting atomist ideas to the modern world.⁶

Atomism, however, faced powerful opposition. Plato fundamentally rejected its materialism, proposing instead a universe shaped by a divine craftsman (the Demiurge) according to perfect, eternal Forms.² Aristotle mounted a systematic and devastating critique that would dominate Western science for nearly two thousand years. He rejected the existence of the void, argued that matter was continuous and infinitely divisible, and, most importantly, condemned the atomists' purely mechanical explanations for their failure to account for purpose, or

telos, in nature. For Aristotle, a complete explanation required understanding not just the material and its motion, but also the form and the final cause—the "why"—of a thing, concepts entirely absent from the atomist worldview.¹⁰

The Medieval Interlude and Renaissance Rebirth

With the ascendancy of Aristotelian philosophy and Christian theology, the mechanistic and implicitly atheistic atomism of Leucippus was largely rejected and forgotten in the Latin West during the Middle Ages.⁴⁴ While atomistic ideas were kept alive and debated within Islamic and Jewish scholasticism, often in the context of theological arguments about creation, they remained outside the European mainstream.⁴⁴

The tide began to turn dramatically in 1417 with the rediscovery of a complete manuscript of Lucretius's De Rerum Natura by the book hunter Poggio Bracciolini.⁴⁷ This event did more than simply revive an ancient text; it reintroduced a complete, coherent, and powerfully articulated non-teleological worldview into a European intellectual climate that was just beginning to question the long-held Aristotelian-Christian synthesis. As the scientific discoveries of the 16th and 17th centuries poked more and more holes in the old authorities, thinkers were actively searching for alternative frameworks to understand the world.⁴⁹ Lucretius provided a ready-made system that explained natural phenomena—from weather and disease to the origins of life—through purely material and mechanical causes, without any need for divine intervention.⁴² It gave intellectuals the conceptual "permission" to imagine a universe governed by impersonal, natural laws, thus providing the philosophical software for the coming Scientific Revolution.

The Scientific Revolution and the Rise of Modern Science

In the 17th century, thinkers began to adapt ancient atomism for a new scientific age. The French priest and philosopher Pierre Gassendi (1592–1655) championed a version of Epicurean atomism that he sought to reconcile with Christian doctrine by arguing that God had created the finite number of atoms in the beginning and set them in motion.⁵¹ In England, the natural philosopher Robert Boyle (1627–1691) advocated for a "corpuscular philosophy." He preferred the term "corpuscle" to "atom" to distance his ideas from the atheistic connotations of ancient atomism.⁵³ Boyle used this particulate view of matter to provide mechanical explanations for his chemical experiments, laying crucial groundwork for the development of modern chemistry.⁵⁴

The decisive transformation of atomism from a philosophical speculation into a quantitative scientific theory came with the work of the English chemist John Dalton between 1803 and 1808.⁵⁶ Unlike Leucippus, who relied on logical deduction to solve a metaphysical problem, Dalton built his theory on a foundation of empirical, experimental evidence.³⁵ His atomic theory was designed specifically to explain the recently discovered laws of chemical combination, such as the law of definite proportions. Dalton's key postulates were that all matter is composed of atoms; that atoms of a given element are identical in mass, while atoms of different elements have different masses; and that chemical compounds are formed by the combination of atoms in simple, whole-number ratios.⁵⁸ This was the birth of scientific atomism, a theory whose power lay not in its philosophical elegance but in its predictive, quantitative accuracy.

The evolution from Leucippus's philosophical concept to the modern scientific one represents a fundamental shift in the nature of knowledge itself.

Table 2: Philosophical Atomism vs. Modern Scientific Atomism

Leucippus's Enduring Legacy in Contemporary Thought

Though the scientific "atom" has proven to be a complex and divisible entity, the core intellectual legacy of Leucippus continues to resonate powerfully in modern thought. The quest he began for the ultimate, fundamental constituents of reality continues in the Standard Model of particle physics, where quarks and leptons have taken the place of his ancient atomoi as the elementary particles.²⁷

More broadly, his philosophy established two foundational principles of the modern scientific worldview. The first is materialism, the belief that the universe is composed of physical substance and nothing more. The second is reductionism, the methodological principle that complex phenomena can be understood by breaking them down and analyzing the properties and interactions of their simpler components.²⁸ This "bottom-up" approach, explaining the whole in terms of its parts, remains a dominant, if sometimes debated, strategy in fields from physics and chemistry to biology and neuroscience.

Finally, Leucippus's insistence that "everything happens from reason and by necessity" prefigures the scientific search for universal, causal laws.⁶ While quantum mechanics has introduced a layer of fundamental indeterminacy that would have surprised him, the overarching goal of science—to provide rational, non-teleological, law-based explanations for the workings of the cosmos—is a direct intellectual inheritance from the shadowy philosopher who first dared to imagine a universe of atoms and the void.

Conclusion: From a Ghost of Miletus to a Pillar of Modernity

The story of Leucippus is the story of an idea's improbable triumph. From a ghost-like figure in the 5th century BCE, whose very existence was questioned, came a conceptual revolution. His true genius was not merely in postulating atoms, but in his audacious declaration that the void—the "nothing"—was just as real as the "something." This brilliant pairing of atoms and the void was the precise intellectual tool needed to dismantle the logical paradoxes of the Eleatic school and reopen the path for a science of nature.

By banishing purpose and divine agency from his cosmology, Leucippus created the first fully mechanistic and deterministic model of the universe. He provided a blueprint for explaining the world from the bottom up, through the ceaseless, necessary interactions of fundamental particles according to fixed laws. This idea, elaborated by Democritus, preserved by Lucretius, and suppressed for a millennium, was reborn in the Renaissance to become the animating spirit of the Scientific Revolution. Transformed by Dalton from a philosophical speculation into a quantitative theory, and refined through centuries of discovery, the atomic concept remains the foundation of our understanding of the material world. The atoms of modern physics bear little resemblance to the solid, uncuttable particles of Leucippus. Yet, the fundamental intellectual shift he initiated—the quest to understand our complex reality in terms of simpler, underlying constituents governed by universal laws—remains the central pillar of the entire scientific enterprise.

Visual Timeline: The Journey of Atomism

• c. 480–420 BCE: Leucippus proposes that reality consists of indivisible particles (atoms) moving in a void, providing a solution to the Eleatic paradoxes of motion and plurality. ⁹
• c. 460–370 BCE: Democritus, Leucippus's student, systematizes and expands atomism into a comprehensive worldview, applying it to ethics, epistemology, and a detailed theory of sensible qualities. ¹³
• c. 384–322 BCE: Aristotle becomes the foremost critic of atomism, rejecting the void and the purely mechanistic worldview in favor of a teleological model of a continuous, purposeful nature. His influence ensures atomism remains a minority view for centuries. ¹¹
• c. 341–270 BCE: Epicurus revives atomism as the physical basis for his ethical philosophy. He modifies the theory by adding "weight" and the indeterminate "swerve" (clinamen) to account for motion and free will. ¹⁵
• c. 99–55 BCE: The Roman poet Lucretius composes De Rerum Natura (On the Nature of Things), an epic poem that eloquently details Epicurean atomism, becoming the primary vehicle for its transmission to later ages. ⁴¹
• c. 400–1400 CE: Medieval Period. Atomism is largely lost to the Latin West, where Aristotelianism dominates. It is, however, discussed and adapted within Islamic and Jewish theological and philosophical traditions. ⁴⁴
• 1417 CE: The humanist Poggio Bracciolini rediscovers a manuscript of Lucretius's De Rerum Natura, reintroducing a complete, non-teleological worldview to a Europe on the cusp of the Renaissance. ⁴⁷
• c. 1650 CE: Pierre Gassendi and Robert Boyle revive and adapt atomism. Gassendi reconciles it with Christianity, while Boyle develops a "corpuscular philosophy" to explain chemical phenomena. ⁵¹
• c. 1808 CE: John Dalton proposes the first truly scientific atomic theory, based on quantitative chemical evidence (the laws of definite and multiple proportions), assigning relative weights to atoms of different elements. ⁵⁶
• 1897 CE: J.J. Thomson discovers the electron, demonstrating that the atom is not, in fact, indivisible, but has a substructure. ³⁶
• 1911 CE: Ernest Rutherford, through his gold foil experiment, proposes the nuclear model of the atom, with a dense, positively charged nucleus surrounded by electrons. ⁶³
• 1913 CE: Niels Bohr applies quantum theory to the Rutherford model, proposing that electrons exist in discrete energy levels, explaining atomic spectra.
• c. 1964–Present: The development of the Standard Model of Particle Physics describes the fundamental particles (quarks and leptons) and forces that constitute what we now understand as the ultimate building blocks of matter, the modern heirs to Leucippus's atomos. ⁴⁴

References

1. Al-Allaf, M. (2021). The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus, Fragments: A Text and Translation with a Commentary. Dokumen.pub. ⁶⁷
2. Berryman, S. (2020). Ancient Atomism. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ²¹
3. Berryman, S. (2022). Democritus. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2022 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ¹⁶
4. Berryman, S. (2023). Leucippus. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ¹
5. Brill. (n.d.). Atomism in Late Medieval Philosophy and Theology. ⁶⁸
6. Britannica. (n.d.). Atom - Development, Theory, Structure. ²⁴
7. Britannica. (n.d.). Atomism - Modern Science, Pioneering Work. ⁶²
8. Britannica. (n.d.). Atomic physics. ⁶³
9. Britannica. (n.d.). Democritus. ³³
10. Britannica. (n.d.). John Dalton - Atomic Theory, Chemistry, Physics. ⁵⁹
11. Britannica. (n.d.). Leucippus. ²⁹
12. Britannica. (n.d.). Pierre Gassendi | Biography, Discoveries, & Facts. ⁵¹
13. Buyse, F. (2016, January 25). Boyle's Corpuscular Philosophy. Irish Philosophy. ⁵³
14. Copleston, F. (n.d.). The Atomists. In A History of Philosophy, Vol. 1: Greece and Rome. Penelope.uchicago.edu. ¹⁰
15. Couprie, D. L. (2018). Leucippus's Atomism. ResearchGate. ³
16. Curd, P. (2020). Presocratic Philosophy. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2020 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. ⁶⁹
17. E-N.A. (2024, June 17). Leucippus in Aristotle's Works. Number Analytics. ¹¹
18. E-N.A. (2024, August 4). The Evolution of Atomistic Thought. Number Analytics. ⁴⁰
19. E-N.A. (2025, March 10). The Ultimate Guide to Leucippus. Number Analytics. ⁵
20. E-N.A. (2025, May 28). The Atomistic Theory in Ancient Greek Philosophy. Number Analytics. ⁷⁰
21. E-N.A. (2025, August 3). Understanding Atomism in Philosophy. Number Analytics. ⁷¹
22. EBSCO. (n.d.). Dalton Formulates the Atomic Theory of Matter. EBSCO Research Starters. ⁵⁶
23. EBSCO. (n.d.). On the Nature of Things by Lucretius. EBSCO Research Starters. ⁴¹
24. EBSCO. (n.d.). Robert Boyle and the Birth of Modern Chemistry. EBSCO Research Starters. ⁵⁴
25. Encyclopedia.com. (n.d.). Leucippus and Democritus. ¹³
26. Encyclopedia.com. (n.d.). Materialism. ²⁸
27. Facts and Details. (n.d.). Ancient Greek Science and Philosophy. ²³
28. Farside Physics. (n.d.). Atomic Theory of Matter. ⁷²
29. Fiveable. (n.d.). Greek Philosophy Unit 6 – The Atomists – Democritus and Leucippus. ³⁷
30. Garrett, J. (n.d.). The Philosophy of Democritus. Western Kentucky University. ²²
31. Gigon, O. (1999). Democritus. In Dictionnaire des philosophes antiques. ³²
32. Graham, D. W. (Ed.). (2010). The Texts of Early Greek Philosophy: The Complete Fragments and Selected Testimonies of the Major Presocratics. Cambridge University Press.
33. Greenblatt, S. (2011). The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. W. W. Norton & Company.
34. Gregory, J. C. (1931). A Short History of Atomism. A. & C. Black, Ltd.
35. Grellard, C., & Robert, A. (Eds.). (2009). Atomism in Late Medieval Philosophy and Theology. Brill.
36. Griffin, M. (2015). Lucretius, 'De Rerum Natura'. In Landmarks in the History of Science.
37. Guthrie, W. K. C. (1965). A History of Greek Philosophy, Vol. 2: The Presocratic Tradition from Parmenides to Democritus. Cambridge University Press.
38. Hegel, G. W. F. (n.d.). Lectures on the History of Philosophy: Empedocles, Leucippus and Democritus. Marxists.org. ³¹
39. I Tatti - The Harvard University Center for Italian Renaissance Studies. (n.d.). Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance. ⁴⁷
40. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Democritus. ⁶⁶
41. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Epicurus. ¹⁵
42. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (n.d.). Leucippus. ⁷³
43. Karamanou, M., et al. (2017). Leucippus, the founder of “atomic theory”, and his influence on medicine. Hellenic Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 20(1), 72-74. ¹⁹
44. Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. (1983). The Presocratic Philosophers: A Critical History with a Selection of Texts (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
45. Laërtius, D. (1925). Lives of the Eminent Philosophers (R. D. Hicks, Trans.). Loeb Classical Library. ²⁰
46. LibreTexts Chemistry. (n.d.). 4.1: Democritus' Idea of the Atom. ⁷⁴
47. LibreTexts Chemistry. (n.d.). 3.1: Modern Atomic Theory. ⁶⁰
48. Luthy, C. H. (2000). The Fourfold Democritus on the Stage of Early Modern Science. Isis, 91(3), 443–479.
49. Michalovic, M. (2008). John Dalton and the Scientific Method. Science History Institute. ⁵⁷
50. Miller, F. (2024, April 10). Leucippus's Philosophy. Philo-notes. ⁶
51. Natural Born Scientists. (2023, October 12). Leucippus and Democritus's Vision of Atoms. ⁷⁵
52. New World Encyclopedia. (n.d.). Leucippus. ¹⁴
53. O'Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (1999a). Democritus of Abdera. MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews. ³⁴
54. O'Connor, J. J., & Robertson, E. F. (1999b). Leucippus of Miletus. MacTutor History of Mathematics Archive, University of St Andrews. ⁹
55. Palmer, A. (2015, August 22). The rediscovery of this writer in the Renaissance opened the way to the modern world. Good Authority. ⁵⁰
56. Palmer, J. (2020). Zeno of Elea. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2020 ed.). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
57. Pyle, A. (1997). Atomism and Its Critics: From Democritus to Newton. Thoemmes Press.
58. Reddit. (2019, October 20). The rediscovery of Lucretius's, "De Rerum Natura" helped shape the Renaissance. r/AskHistorians. ⁴⁸
59. Reddit. (2021, April 4). Democritus and Leucippus: The Story of Ancient Atomism. r/philosophy. ⁷⁶
60. Reddit. (2022, December 1). Democritus and Leucippus, the ancient atomists. r/philosophy. ²⁷
61. Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (1998). Leucippus (5th century BC). ⁷⁷
62. Science and Industry Museum. (2019, April 16). John Dalton: atoms, eyesight and auroras. ⁵⁸
63. Sedley, D. (2008). Atomism's Eleatic Roots. In P. Curd & D. W. Graham (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Presocratic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
64. Society of Catholic Scientists. (n.d.). Pierre Gassendi. ⁵²
65. Taylor, C. C. W. (1999). The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus. University of Toronto Press.
66. The Collector. (2023, January 24). Philosophy of Atomism: Did Ancient Greek Thinkers Discover Atoms? ⁷⁸
67. The Other and One. (n.d.). Leucippus & Democritus. ²⁵
68. Thuesen, A. (2023, September 21). The Atomists: Bridging Sensualism and Rationalism in Pre-Socratic Philosophy. Philosophy Institute. ⁷⁹
69. University of Virginia Physics. (n.d.). Evolution of the Concept of the Atom. ⁸⁰
70. Warren, J. (2004). Facing Death: Epicurus and His Critics. Clarendon Press.
71. Waterfield, R. (Trans.). (2000). The First Philosophers: The Presocratics and the Sophists. Oxford University Press.
72. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Atomism. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁴⁴
73. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Corpuscularianism. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁵⁵
74. Wikipedia. (n.d.). De rerum natura. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁴²
75. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Democritus. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁸¹
76. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Diogenes Laertius. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁸²
77. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Epicureanism. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ³⁹
78. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Leucippus. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ²
79. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Lucretius. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁸³
80. Wikipedia. (n.d.). Robert Boyle. Retrieved August 8, 2025. ⁸⁴
81. World History Encyclopedia. (2021, July 14). Democritus. ⁸⁵

To further support the dissemination of historical and philosophical knowledge, consider securing this foundational name for the digital age. The domain leucippus.com is available for purchase.

Works cited

1. Leucippus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2011 Edition), accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/sum2011/entries/leucippus/
2. Leucippus - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leucippus
3. Leucippus's Atomism - ResearchGate, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290103952_Leucippus's_Atomism
4. Leucippus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Winter 2013 Edition), accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/win2013/entries/leucippus/
5. The Ultimate Guide to Leucippus - Number Analytics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-leucippus
6. Leucippus's Philosophy - PHILO-notes, accessed August 7, 2025, https://philonotes.com/2023/04/leucippuss-philosophy
7. LacusCurtius • Diogenes Laërtius: Epicurus, accessed August 7, 2025, https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diogenes_Laertius/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/10/Epicurus*.html
8. 10. leucippus and democritus: fifth-century atomism - A Presocratics Reader, accessed August 7, 2025, https://users.manchester.edu/Facstaff/SSNaragon/Online/texts/316/Presocratics/Atomism.pdf
9. Leucippus (480 BC - 420 BC) - Biography - MacTutor History of ..., accessed August 7, 2025, https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Leucippus/
10. The Atomists, accessed August 7, 2025, https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Topics/philosophy/_Texts/COPHP/10*.html
11. Leucippus in Aristotle's Works - Number Analytics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/leucippus-in-aristotle
12. Aristotle Leucippus | PDF - Scribd, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/444206482/AristotleLeucippus
13. Leucippus and Democritus - Encyclopedia.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.encyclopedia.com/humanities/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/leucippus-and-democritus
14. Leucippus - New World Encyclopedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Leucippus
15. Epicurus | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/epicur/
16. Democritus (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democritus/
17. The Presocratics: Leucippus and Democritus - Psych Reviews, accessed August 7, 2025, https://psychreviews.org/the-presocratics-leucippus-and-democritus/
18. ATOMISTS, Testimonia, Part 1: Person (P) - Loeb Classical Library, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.loebclassics.com/view/atomists-person/2016/pb_LCL530.17.xml
19. The “atomic theory” of Leucippus, and its impact on medicine before Hippocrates, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.nuclmed.gr/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/72-1.pdf
20. LacusCurtius • Diogenes Laërtius: Leucippus, accessed August 7, 2025, https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Diogenes_Laertius/Lives_of_the_Eminent_Philosophers/9/Leucippus*.html
21. Ancient Atomism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy/Summer 2020 Edition), accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/archIves/sum2020/entries/atomism-ancient/
22. The Atomism of Democritus, accessed August 7, 2025, https://people.wku.edu/jan.garrett/democ.htm
23. Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus - Early European History And Religion, accessed August 7, 2025, https://europe.factsanddetails.com/article/entry-275.html
24. www.britannica.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/atom/Development-of-atomic-theory#:~:text=Leucippus%20of%20Miletus%20(5th%20century,indivisible%2C%E2%80%9D%20about%20430%20bce.
25. Leucippus & Democritus - The Other and One, accessed August 7, 2025, https://theotherandone.com/leucippus-democritus
26. Leucippus and Democritus, accessed August 7, 2025, https://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/history/leucippus.html
27. Democritus and Leucippus: The Ancient Atomists : r/philosophy - Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/z9po5c/democritus_and_leucippus_the_ancient_atomists/
28. Materialism | Encyclopedia.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.encyclopedia.com/philosophy-and-religion/philosophy/philosophy-terms-and-concepts/materialism
29. Leucippus | Atomist, Pre-Socratic, Monist - Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https:// www.britannica.com/biography/Leucippus
30. Leucippus and Democritus on Like to Like and ou mallon - CORE, accessed August 7, 2025, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/16229155.pdf
31. E. Empedoelus, Leucippus and Democritus., accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/hegel/works/hp/hpdemocr.htm
32. Democritus - Classics - Oxford Bibliographies, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/abstract/document/obo-9780195389661/obo-9780195389661-0155.xml
33. Democritus | Biography & Facts | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Democritus
34. Democritus (460 BC - 370 BC) - Biography - MacTutor History of Mathematics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://mathshistory.st-andrews.ac.uk/Biographies/Democritus/
35. Atom - Development, Theory, Structure | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/atom/Development-of-atomic-theory
36. The History of the Atom – Theories and Models - Compound Interest, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.compoundchem.com/2016/10/13/atomicmodels/
37. Greek Philosophy Unit 6 – The Atomists – Democritus and Leucippus - Fiveable, accessed August 7, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/greek-philosophy/unit-6
38. plato.stanford.edu, accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atomism-ancient/#:~:text=Democritus'%20atomism%20was%20revived%20in,pleasant%20life%20lived%20with%20friends.
39. Epicureanism - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicureanism
40. The Evolution of Atomistic Thought - Number Analytics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/evolution-of-atomistic-thought
41. On the Nature of Things by Lucretius | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/religion-and-philosophy/nature-things-lucretius
42. De rerum natura - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/De_rerum_natura
43. 175 Plato's Metaphysical Anti-Atomism I II, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.pdcnet.org/scholarpdf/show?id=swphilreview_2024_0040_0001_0175_0183&file_type=pdf
44. Atomism - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomism
45. Is nature continuous or discrete? How the atomist error was born | Aeon Ideas, accessed August 7, 2025, https://aeon.co/ideas/is-nature-continuous-or-discrete-how-the-atomist-error-was-born
46. Medieval Atomism », in H. Lagerlund (éd.), Encyclopaedia of Medieval Philosophy, Dordrecht-Heidelberg- London-New York, Springer, 2011, p. 122-125. - ResearchGate, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234015472_Medieval_Atomism_in_H_Lagerlund_ed_Encyclopaedia_of_Medieval_Philosophy_Dordrecht-Heidelberg-_London-New_York_Springer_2011_p_122-125
47. Reading Lucretius in the Renaissance | I Tatti - Harvard University, accessed August 7, 2025, https://itatti.harvard.edu/publications/reading-lucretius-renaissance%C2%A0
48. www.reddit.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/dkc75x/the_rediscovery_of_lucretiuss_de_rerum_natura/#:~:text=RusticBohemian-,The%20rediscovery%20of%20Lucretius's%2C%20%22De%20Rerum%20Natura%22%20helped%20shape,around%20beauty%2C%20pleasure%20%26%20reason.
49. The rediscovery of this writer in the Renaissance opened the way to the modern world (and, more important, the invention of political science) - Stanford CIS, accessed August 7, 2025, https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/publications/rediscovery-writer-renaissance-opened-way-modern-world-and-more-important-invention/
50. The rediscovery of this writer in the Renaissance opened the way to the modern world (and, more important, the invention of political science) - Good Authority, accessed August 7, 2025, https://goodauthority.org/news/the-rediscovery-of-this-writer-in-the-renaissance-opened-the-way-to-the-modern-world-and-more-important-the-invention-of-political-science/
51. Pierre Gassendi | Biography, Discoveries, & Facts | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Pierre-Gassendi
52. Pierre Gassendi - The Society of Catholic Scientists, accessed August 7, 2025, https://catholicscientists.org/scientists-of-the-past/pierre-gassendi/
53. Boyle's Corpuscular Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.irishphilosophy.com/2016/01/25/boyles-corpuscular-philosophy/
54. Robert Boyle and the Birth of Modern Chemistry | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/robert-boyle-and-birth-modern-chemistry
55. Corpuscularianism - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpuscularianism
56. Dalton Formulates the Atomic Theory of Matter | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/history/dalton-formulates-atomic-theory-matter
57. John Dalton and the Scientific Method | Science History Institute, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.sciencehistory.org/stories/magazine/john-dalton-and-the-scientific-method/
58. www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.scienceandindustrymuseum.org.uk/objects-and-stories/john-dalton-atoms-eyesight-and-auroras#:~:text=Dalton's%20theory%20was%20based%20on,knew%20of%20at%20the%20time.
59. John Dalton - Atomic Theory, Chemistry, Physics | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/biography/John-Dalton/Atomic-theory
60. 3.1 Modern Atomic Theory - Chemistry LibreTexts, accessed August 7, 2025, https://chem.libretexts.org/Courses/Grand_Rapids_Community_College/CHM_110%3A_Chemistry_of_the_Modern_World_(Neils)/3%3A_Atomic_Structure/3.1_Modern_Atomic_Theory
61. Atomism from the 17th to the 20th Century - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/atomism-modern/
62. Atomism - Modern Science, Pioneering Work | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/atomism/Modern-scientific-atomism-early-pioneering-work
63. Atomic physics | Structure, Particles & Energy | Britannica, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/science/atomic-physics
64. John Dalton and the London atomists: William and Bryan Higgins, William Austin, and new Daltonian doubts about the origin of the atomic theory - PubMed Central, accessed August 7, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4213434/
65. Atomism: Democritus and Leucippus' Materialist Universe - Philosophy Institute, accessed August 7, 2025, https://philosophy.institute/ancient-medieval/democritus-leucippus-atomism-materialist-universe/
66. plato.stanford.edu, accessed August 7, 2025, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/democritus/#:~:text=He%20elaborated%20a%20system%20originated,about%20in%20an%20infinite%20void.
67. The Atomists: Leucippus and Democritus - Fragments (a text and translation with a commentary) 0802043909, 9780802043900, 9781442671102, 1442671106 - DOKUMEN.PUB, accessed August 7, 2025, https://dokumen.pub/the-atomists-leucippus-and-democritus-fragments-a-text-and-translation-with-a-commentary-0802043909-9780802043900-9781442671102-1442671106-d-6126873.html
68. Atomism in Late Medieval Philosophy and Theology - Brill, accessed August 7, 2025, https://brill.com/view/journals/nun/26/2/article-p391_6.pdf
69. Pre-Socratic philosophy - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pre-Socratic_philosophy
70. The Atomistic Theory Explained - Number Analytics, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/atomistic-theory-ancient-greek-philosophy
71. www.numberanalytics.com, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/ultimate-guide-to-atomism-in-philosophy#:~:text=Atomism's%20Influence%20on%20Modern%20Thought&text=The%20discovery%20of%20atoms%20and,composed%20of%20discrete%2C%20indivisible%20particles.
72. The atomic theory of matter - Richard Fitzpatrick, accessed August 7, 2025, https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/sm1/lectures/node5.html
73. Leucippus-img | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/leucippus-img/
74. 4.1: Democritus' Idea of the Atom - Chemistry LibreTexts, accessed August 7, 2025, https://chem.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Introductory_Chemistry/Book%3A_Introductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)/04%3A_Atomic_Structure/4.01%3A_Democritus'_Idea_of_the_Atom
75. Leucippus and Democritus's Vision of Atoms - Natural Born Scientists ®, LLC, accessed August 7, 2025, http://www.naturalbornscientists.com/new-blog-4/2023/10/12/leucippus-and-democrituss-vision-of-atoms
76. Democritus and Leucippus ⁠— the story of Ancient Atomism, its creators and how they arrived at their pioneering theory : r/philosophy - Reddit, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/mjztc8/democritus_and_leucippus_the_story_of_ancient/
77. Leucippus (5th century BC) - Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.rep.routledge.com/articles/biographical/leucippus-5th-century-bc/v-1
78. Philosophy of Atomism: Did Ancient Greek Thinkers Discover Atoms? - TheCollector, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.thecollector.com/ancient-greeks-discover-atoms-atomism/
79. The Atomists: Bridging Sensualism and Rationalism in Pre-Socratic Philosophy, accessed August 7, 2025, https://philosophy.institute/western-philosophy/pre-socratic-atomists-sensualism-rationalism/
80. Evolution of the Concept of the Atom - Galileo, accessed August 7, 2025, https://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/252/atoms.html
81. Democritus - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democritus
82. Diogenes Laertius - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diogenes_Laertius
83. Lucretius - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucretius
84. Robert Boyle - Wikipedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Boyle
85. Democritus - World History Encyclopedia, accessed August 7, 2025, https://www.worldhistory.org/Democritus/